Here's a breakdown of why sharing an Access database directly on OneDrive, Dropbox, Google Drive is problematic and what alternatives to consider:
Why it's not recommended:
- OneDrive synchronizes files by downloading and uploading the entire file. When multiple users are working on the same Access database, this can lead to conflicts and overwrites as each user's changes are synced.
- Opening and saving the entire database file repeatedly can cause significant performance issues, especially with larger databases.
- The frequent syncing and potential conflicts can lead to data corruption and loss.
Recommended Alternatives:
- Divide the Access database into a front-end (containing user interface elements like forms, reports, and queries) and a back-end (containing the data tables).
- Place the back-end on a shared network location (like a shared folder on a server or a NAS drive).
- Each user can then have a copy of the front-end on their local machine.
- This allows multiple users to work with the database concurrently without directly interfering with each other's changes.
- Divide the Access database into a front-end (containing user interface elements like forms, reports, and queries) and a back-end (containing the data tables).
- Cloud hosted MySQL database solutions offer scalable and reliable alternatives.
- These services are designed to handle concurrent access and data management efficiently.
- They can be more complex to set up initially but offer long-term benefits for larger or more complex databases.
- Cloud hosted MySQL database solutions offer scalable and reliable alternatives.
Parts is a split Access Database with a front-end application that supports both Local Access databases and remote cloud hosted MySQL databases.
Contact Parts for an online demo or to discuss how to create a shared Altium database library.
Randy Clemmons
No comments:
Post a Comment