Tuesday, November 3, 2026

Compare Excel Workbooks - Copilot

Copilot Request

Compare two Excel workbooks. Report all value changes, formula changes, added/removed rows, and missing worksheets. Generate the results as an Excel report.

What you did is actually the correct upload method. The issue is that Copilot Web can handle uploaded Excel files in a few different ways depending on the session and feature rollout.

To maximize the chance that I receive the actual workbook binary (so I can create a downloadable comparison workbook):

  1. Start a new chat.
  2. Click Upload images and files.
  3. Select the two .xlsx files from your PC.
  4. Wait until the files appear as attachments.
  5. Send a message such as:

    Compare these two Excel files and create an Excel differences report.

A few things to avoid:

  • Don't use Attach cloud files.
  • Don't paste OneDrive links.
  • Don't open the workbook first and share it from Excel.
  • Upload the local .xlsx files directly from disk.

What happened in this session is that Copilot exposed the workbook contents as searchable document data rather than giving me direct access to the workbook files themselves. I could read and compare the data, but I couldn't generate and return a new .xlsx report from those attachments.

A quick test:

  • Create a brand-new chat.
  • Upload a small Excel file (even a simple test workbook).
  • Ask: "How many sheets are in this workbook?"
  • If I can inspect workbook metadata and generate files from it, then the binary upload path is working.

Based on the files you uploaded, I was able to determine that the two workbooks are effectively identical except for the worksheet name (parts vs Imported). [Parts Demo...61103.xlsx | Excel], [Parts Demo...61103.xlsx | Excel]

If you'd like, I can also show you a very robust Excel/VBA or Python comparison utility that will generate the exact differences report locally on your machine for large BOM and parts-library comparisons.

Saturday, October 31, 2026

Soft / Flexible Termination

What Soft / Flexible Termination Means:

In standard MLCCs, the end terminations consist of rigid metallic layers (typically Copper/Nickel/Tin). When a PCB undergoes mechanical flexing—from panel depanelation, screw mounting, thermal cycling, or shock/vibration—that strain is transferred directly to the rigid ceramic body, causing micro-cracks that can lead to catastrophic electrical shorts.

Soft Termination places a conductive, pliable epoxy polymer layer between the inner copper electrode/ceramic body and the outer nickel/tin barrier plating:

  1. Strain Absorption: The flexible polymer layer absorbs mechanical stress, allowing the component to withstand significantly higher board flexure without cracking the ceramic dielectric.
  2. Fail-Safe Mechanism: If extreme over-stress occurs, the soft termination layer usually yields or separates at the termination interface rather than propagating a crack through the ceramic body, preventing high-voltage short-circuit failures (especially critical in high-voltage 2kV automotive/industrial applications).

Manufacturer Naming Equivalent for Soft Termination:

Each vendor uses their own trademarked name for this exact technology:

  • Knowles Syfer: FlexiCap™ (represented by the Y suffix in 1206Y...)
  • KEMET: FT-CAP / Flexible Termination (represented by the X suffix in C1206X...)
  • KYOCERA AVX: FLEXITERM® (represented by the Z termination code in ...KAZ2A)
  • TDK: Soft Termination / MEGACAP
  • Murata: Resin External Electrode (Automotive KRM/GCJ series)

Parts User Defined Fields

Parts has 15 User Defined Fields, like Features and Termination, see User Defined Fields

Country Code - English

Parts Supports text Drag and Drop from DigiKey and Mouser in English.

To use Drag and Drop (Copy and Paste) of parametric data you need to select an English Country for your location.

Click on images to view